Day10- UNION

Day10- UNION

An OPEN LETTER to HUMANITY;

The ROOT_Meaning of the word 'marriage' is OBVIOUS: UNION/ATTACHMENT.

My hand has a 'union' with a doorknob and is therefore married to it for a certain time-period.

See how that works? Fascinating, isn't it?

Now, let's add BAGGAGE:

-- and along comes a group of 'positive-people' that develop a NEW CONTEXT in which to use the term 'UNION' : 'committment' ; thusly declaring war on the 'negative-people' that do not recognize their new, errrrr, 'fact.'

-- and along comes another group of 'positive-people' that develop another CONTEXT in which to use the term 'UNION' : 'committment WITH conditions' ; thusly declaring war on the 'negative-people' and the 'old-positive-people' that do not recognize their new, errrrr, 'fact.'

-- and along comes another group of 'positive-people' that develop yet ANOTHER CONTEXT in which to use the term 'UNION' : 'committment WITH conditions PLUS contract' ; and this requires PAYING MONEY TO THEM in order to wage war on the 'negative-people' AND the 'old-positive-people' AND the 'newer-old-positive-people.'

-- and along comes yet ANOTHER group of 'positive-people' that develop more CONTEXT in which to use the term 'UNION' : 'committment WITH conditions PLUS contract PLUS license' ; and this requires PAYING MORE MONEY TO MORE PEOPLE in order to wage war on the 'negative-people' AND the 'old-positive-people' AND the 'newer-old-old-positive-people.'

And the 'wars' are horrible. They are ENDLESS_SUFFERAGE, the definition of HELL.

What we have going on right NOW in the United States, is one of the groups of 'positive-people' PROVING their INTOLERANCE by attempting to DISCRIMINATE against more and more 'negative-people,' by petition, verbal-harrassment, ostracization, and the very 'antiAmerican' attitude of going AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION by developing LAW to INTENTIONALLY DENY RIGHTS to a 'group' and thereby establishing a 'special-interest' group all their own. Worse, this becomes a RELIGIOUS-LAW favoring RELIGIOUS_CrossOfShame, where they HAMMER the 'negative-people.'

Botton-line, see. TRUTH.

Truth never lies nor deceives. You KNOW it -- you FEEL it -- you EXPERIENCE TRUTH at the CORE of YOUR being. It does not require complicated explanations. It's ALWAYS SIMPLE.

ALWAYS SIMPLE.
ALWAYS SIMPLE.
ALWAYS SIMPLE.

Obviously, we have MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS of a SINGLE WORD that has ONE MEANING.

Following? See how SIMPLE it really IS?

Why WAR over the OBVIOUS? It costs $billions$ to create LAWS. These laws are unConstitutional, Discriminatory AND equate to ReligiousTerrorism.

Why 'ReligiousTerrorism?' Because it's NOT about the stupid 'word' anymore. It becomes a WEAPON of HATE to be INTOLERANT of BELOVED_NEIGHBORS.

Complete with jail-sentences, fines, arrests, court hearings, juries, sentencing, and guess who gets caught in the middle? COPS! And now you know how horrible it really is! You are putting MORE BELOVED_NEIGHBORS in IMPOSSIBLE situations so that YOU may be INTOLERANT of BelovedNeighbors.

It's RIDICULOUS and YOU know it!

Meanwhile, there's another group of 'positive-people' that want to have AT LEAST THE SAME 'status' that all those other 'other-positive-people' have.

So, LET's REVIEW WHAT THEY HAVE:
- 60% divorce
- dumbed-down educational institutions
- censored media
- too expensive healthcare
- too expensive protections/services
- 'special-interest-status' to be INTOLERANT
- higher cost of government
- higher cost of courts and child-services
- and a FEE/LICENSE/CLUB to pay/join
- 75% 'infidelity'

Nice, huh? Who would want THAT?

Who would want THAT?
Who would want THAT?
Who would want THAT?

To FIX IT, we need ENNUMERATE the CONTEXT of the word: UNION.

It's THAT simple. TRUTH.

If you want ReligiousIntolerantExclusive 'marriage,' then you are in VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

You will LOSE when the SupremeCourt reviews the case.

It's THAT simple. TRUTH.

If you want a ReligiousIntolerantUnion to EXCLUDE others from participation, then you will LOSE when it is reviewed by the Supreme Court.

It's THAT simple. TRUTH.

So, obviously we have a GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY to DEFINE MARRIAGE as a UNION between PEOPLE. PERIOD. TRUTH.

How YOU, personally, with your hammering-away on your own CrossOfShame, BLAME your BelovedNeighbors for their OWN interpretation of the above is YOUR LITERAL HATRED SPEAKING. Period. TRUTH.

Intolerance is the definition of 'hatred,' see. TRUTH.

The FIX is OBVIOUS. YOU, personally may not 'like it,' but it's not about CrotchPsychology, is it? Why not worry about your own, before MINE, see?

And neither I nor ANYONE ELSE has the right to put a police-officer in the middle of your CrotchPsychology.

So, what is 'CrotchPsychology,' you may be asking. Well, if this term has NOT been defined to you, personally, YET, I will share with you a brief description: 'perverted fixation on someone else's crotch and 'freaking-out' about it, PROVING INTOLERANCE by your OWN ACTIONS.' So, you form groups of HATE; you pass out flyers and petitions of HATE; then you attempt to pass laws of HATE to be INTOLERANT of your BelovedNeighbors.

Shame on YOU, by the way. And that's why your CrossOfShame is such an horrible DECEPTION.

All people belong to the HumanityFamily FIRST, and are MarriedInLiving, FIRST, before adding all the BAGGAGE to be INTOLERANT/HATEFUL of their BelovedNeighbors, see.

It's THAT simple. TRUTH.

FIX IT! Thank you!

Kind Regards,
GOG, SupremeAlliedCommander
UniversalTheorem
OnTime - RU?